See Article History Phrenology, the study of the conformation of the skull as indicative of mental faculties and traits of character, especially according to the hypotheses of Franz Joseph Gall —a German doctor, and such 19th-century adherents as Johann Kaspar Spurzheim — and George Combe — Phrenology enjoyed great popular appeal well into the 20th century but has been wholly discredited by scientific research.
Your Brain on Politics: Can neuroscience provide evidence for a liberal and conservative thinking style?
It may seem like a stretch to say that one could predict whether you lean left or right by looking at a brain scan—no questions asked, no opinions voiced—purely based on your neuroanatomy.
However, this might not be too far from reality—at least insofar as predicting thinking style, which has been shown to be somewhat distinct based on party association. Does brain structure determine your beliefs, or do your beliefs change your brain structure?
What about those who switch parties at some point? How do they fit in to this model?
Please keep in mind from the beginning that this is not an endorsement of any one political party. More than one study has shown these same results, which is why I felt it was worth investigating. A few questions to keep in mind: If these differences do legitimately exist, how can—or better yet—how should we use this knowledge?
How can insight gained from research of this kind prove helpful in the quest for more effective communication across party lines? Can empathy and understanding of personality differences, without judgments or stereotyping, aid in the productivity of political debates around topics such as climate change or evolution?
A few clarifications The idea of a genetic or a neurological difference between liberals and conservatives is a hot topic of debate. In fact, Chris has covered quite a bit of it on this blog. Consequently, there has been a lot of thorough criticism of these converging studies—the methods, types of subjects, error bars, the flaws in design, sample size, etc, etc, ad nauseam, ad infinitum.
But more research keeps cropping up that shows this same trend, so I feel at this point we should be thinking a little more about what this all means in the big picture. Maybe each study has some flaws—I can probably find a few things in every study that could be improved upon.
I also know the danger of over-applying and over-generalization of results like these to an entire population, or assuming that a group tendency necessarily applies to every single person in that group. Correlations are also not the same as causation.
So I get it. That tells me something. In cases like these I tend to look more at the data and pay less attention to the analyses, drawing my own conclusions from the data across all the studies. One paper may not have all the answers, but I think there is enough mounting evidence in the stack of literature that we can start carefully drawing some conclusions.
What I will do is look at the pattern across several of these papers and talk about what this implies in the larger scheme of things. These are the ones I want to focus on. The Amodio study found that liberalism correlated with greater activity in the anterior cingulate cortexor the ACC, while the Kanai study found that liberalism correlated with increased gray matter volume or a larger ACC, as shown in MRI scans.
Additionally, the Kanai study found that conservatism was correlated with increased volume of the right amygdala. Recent work has shown a correlation between liberalism and conflict-related activity measured by event-related potentials originating in the anterior cingulate cortex.Buy The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field on regardbouddhiste.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders.
Jan 07, · Phrenology was wildly popular for much of the 19th century, but later went out of fashion. Debunking Phrenology with 21st Century Methods() Pingback: Volume . Carol S. Dweck, Ph.D., is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading researchers in the fields of personality, social psychology, and developmental psychology.
She is the Lewis and Virginia Eaton Professor of Psychology at Stanford University, has been elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the National Academy of Sciences, and has won nine lifetime achievement awards.
Sep 07, · This is an invited guest post by Andrea Kuszewski, a Behavior Therapist and Consultant for children on the autism spectrum based in Florida, and . Phrenology (from Ancient Greek φρήν (phrēn), meaning 'mind', and λόγος (), meaning 'knowledge') is a pseudomedicine primarily focused on measurements of the human skull, based on the concept that the brain is the organ of the mind, and that certain brain areas have localized, specific functions or modules.
Although both of those ideas have a basis in reality, phrenology extrapolated. In the early s, phrenology was a popular method of psychology.
Phrenology is the theory that the bumps on a person’s head can foretell a person’s personality. Using this theory, many early psychologists were able to distinguish characteristics in a person’s personality to assist parents with raising children or helping someone find a.