An introduction to the history of the domestication of the north american frontier

The widening toes on a camel's hoof provide supplemental grip for varying soil sediments. It resembles a long, swollen, pink tongue hanging out of the side of its mouth. Concentrating body fat in their humps minimizes the insulating effect fat would have if distributed over the rest of their bodies, helping camels survive in hot climates. This fat metabolizationwhile releasing energy, causes water to evaporate from the lungs during respiration as oxygen is required for the metabolic process:

An introduction to the history of the domestication of the north american frontier

Hand axes associated with the hominin Homo erectus have been found at Ternifine, and Sidi Abd el-Rahmane has produced evidence of the same hominin dating to at leastyears ago.

Succeeding these early hand ax remains are the Levalloisian and Mousterian industries similar to those found in the Levant. It is claimed that nowhere did the Middle Paleolithic Old Stone Age evolution of flake tool techniques reach a higher state of development than in North Africa.

Radiocarbon testing from Morocco indicates a date of about 30, years ago for early Aterian industry. Its diffusion over the region appears to have taken place during one of the periods of desiccation, and the carriers of the tradition were clearly adept desert hunters.

The few associated human remains are Neanderthal, with substantial differences between those found in the west and those in Cyrenaica. In the latter area a date of about 45, years ago for the Levalloisian and Mousterian industries has been obtained at Haua Fteah, Libya.

The tools and a fragmentary human fossil of Neanderthal type are almost identical to those of Palestine. The earliest blade industry of the Maghrib, associated as in Europe with the final supersession of Neanderthals by modern Homo sapiens, is named Ibero-Maurusian or Oranian type site La Mouilla, near Oran in western Algeria.

Of obscure origin, this industry seems to have spread along all the coastal areas of the Maghrib and Cyrenaica between about 15, and 10, bc. Following the Ibero-Maurusian was the Capsianthe origin of which is also obscure. The climate during both Ibero-Maurusian and Capsian times appears to have been relatively dry and the fauna one of open country, ideal for hunting.

Between about and bc upper Capsian industry spread northward to influence the Ibero-Maurusian and also eastward to the Gulf of Sidra. Since there is much evidence that the Neolithic culture of the Maghrib was introduced not by invasion but through the acceptance of new ideas and technologies by the Capsian peoples, it is probable that they were the ancestors of the Libyans known in historic times.

The spread of early Neolithic culture in Libya and the Maghrib occurred during the 6th and 5th millennia bc and is characterized by the domestication of animals and the shift from hunting and gathering to self-supporting food production often still including hunting. The pastoral economy, with cattle the chief animal, remained dominant in North Africa until the classical period.

Although the new type of economy may have originated in Egypt or the Sudanthe character of the flint-working tradition of the Maghribian Neolithic argues in favour of the survival of much of the earlier culture, which has been called Neolithic-of-Capsian tradition. Accordingly, the technology of the transition, if not of independent local origin, is best explained by the gradual diffusion of new techniques rather than by the immigration of new peoples.

The Neolithic-of-Capsian tradition in the Maghrib persisted at least into the 1st millennium bc with relatively little change and development; there was no great flourishing of late Neolithic culture and little that can be described as a Bronze Age.

North Africa was wholly lacking in metallic ores other than iron, hence most tools and weapons continued to be made of stone until the introduction of ironworking techniques.

Prehistoric rock carvings have been found in the southern foothills of the Atlas Mountains south of Oran and in the Ahaggar and Tibesti ranges. While some are relatively recent, the great majority appear to be of the Neolithic-of-Capsian tradition.

An introduction to the history of the domestication of the north american frontier

Some show animals now locally or even totally extinct, such as the giant buffalo, elephant, rhinoceros, and hippopotamus, in areas now covered by desert. While Egyptian-like patterns may be discerned, the character of the rock art is so different from that of Egypt that it can hardly be said to derive from it.

An introduction to the history of the domestication of the north american frontier

On the other hand, it is very much later than the rock paintings of Paleolithic times in southwestern Europe, and an independent development is probable.

The art is primarily that of a culture that continued to depend largely—though not exclusively—on hunting and that survived on the Saharan fringes until historical times. There are many thousands of large, stone-built surface tombs in North Africa that appear to have no connection with earlier megalithic structures found in northern Europe, and it is unlikely that any of them is earlier than the 1st millennium bc.

Large structures in Algeria such as the tumulus at Mzora feet [54 metres] in diameter and the mausoleum known as the Medracen feet [40 metres] in diameter are probably from the 4th and 3rd centuries bc and show Phoenician influence, though there is much that appears to be purely Libyan.

The Carthaginian period The Phoenician settlements North Africa with the exception of Cyrenaica entered the mainstream of Mediterranean history with the arrival in the 1st millennium bc of Phoenician traders, mainly from Tyre and Sidon in modern Lebanon.

The Phoenicians were looking not for land to settle but for anchorages and staging points on the trade route from Phoenicia to Spaina source of silver and tin. Points on an alternative route by way of SicilySardinia, and the Balearic Islands also were occupied. The Phoenicians lacked the manpower and the need to found large colonies as the Greeks did, and few of their settlements grew to any size.

The sites chosen were generally offshore islands or easily defensible promontories with sheltered beaches on which ships could be drawn up. The dates appear legendary, and no Phoenician object earlier than the 8th century bc has yet been found in the west.

At Carthage some Greek objects have been found, datable to about or slightly later, which comes within two generations of the traditional date. Little can be learned from the romantic legends about the arrival of the Phoenicians at Carthage transmitted by Greco-Roman sources.

Though individual voyages doubtless took place earlier, the establishment of permanent posts is unlikely to have taken place before bc, antedating the parallel movement of Greeks to Sicily and southern Italy.

Unlike the Greek settlements, however, those of the Phoenicians long depended politically on their homeland, and only a few were situated where the hinterland had the potential for development.The Frontier Thesis Introduction The emergence of western history as an important field of scholarship started with Frederick Jackson Turner’s () famous essay “The Significance of the Frontier in American history.”[1] This thesis shaped both popular and .

Despite the critics' dissent, Turner's Frontier Thesis was the prevailing view of the frontier taught in American schools and colleges until the mids. There were (and are) entire books and readers for classroom use devoted extensively to the Turner Thesis.

The Significance of the Frontier in American History Words | 6 Pages. along the American frontier? What Turner wants to point out here is that the American West is the most important feature of American history, and of the development of its society.

Out on the frontier, he argued, "the existence of an area of free land, its continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward, explain American development" (Frontier in History, p.

1). The frontier experience did not help explain, partially explain, or largely "explain American development"; it did the explaining by itself. Domestication, and Evolution of Maize Edited by John E. Staller Department of Anthropology Histories of Maize ROBERT H.

TYKOT Isotope Definitions History of Isotope Studies Zea mayson the Frontier: A South American Case The Study Area For US scholars, the very word frontier is irrevocably linked to the legacy of historian Frederick Jackson Turner (–), who, in his essay “The Significance of The Frontier in American History,” cast the frontier as both a moving line of settlement and the well-spring of American .

Social Science History Bibliography